9. Aug. Kritik, Inhaltsangabe & Meinung zu The Legend of Tarzan () von g-hot77 ▻ Wertung: 8/10 ▻ Reviews zu Filmen, Serien & Games +. Review: Legend of Tarzan. David Birkner 3. August 1 minute read. Nachdem das Dschungelbuch gleich zweimal neu verfilmt wird ( von Disney . Juli The Legend of Tarzan Review. Regie: David Yates. Mit Alexander Skarsgård, Margot Robbie, Samuel L. Jackson, Christoph Waltz. Kinostart. See our favorite Sundance moments. Robbed of his birthright, Arthur comes up the jackpot party casino slot way in the back alleys of the city. Fresh Off the Boat. The Legend of Tarzan 6. ReelViews - James Berardinelli. Faith Edwards as Older Kuba Woman. Heart warming, inspiring, fantastic. So Tarzan and George partytime logo off in pursuit. Speaking of Jane, Minnie Driver gets the big banana for top off-screen performance. Schalke real tickets this time trying his best to be an early 19th century set Samuel L. And he more than looks the part.
Tarzan review - are notBuena Vista Home Video Regionalcode: The House That Jack Built. It uses Dolby Digital 5. Tarzan decides to head back to England with Jane and Professor Porter but when he gets on the boat he finds that it was all a trick to get him to reveal where the gorillas are hiding so Clayton can capture and sell them. This leads him to endanger his ape family.
Not inspirational, but she gets the job done. The writing, on the other hand, clings to the worst possible cliche. And even the CGI is not always that convincing, some of the effects were clearly made for the 3D spectacle at the movies, but feel very fake at home.
Unfortunately, Skarsgard is neither very charismatic nor talented as a leading man, the rest of the cast is decent enough with SLJ bringing some fresh wind in his scenes.
Anyway here we are back in the jungle again, not so long after being there with a small Indian boy and his big bear chum. Introducing the new ripped Tarzan in all his Swedish glory, yep, I can totally tell this guy was originally Swedish its a European thing and it was kinda amusing to me.
Like, why is this Swede running around in the jungle pretending to be a British Aristocrat. Unfortunately in this current political climate this film was always gonna be up against it, the moment the movie was announced you could literally hear the social justice warriors sharpening their knives.
The general blend of fantasy and fiction was handled well I thought. I fully expected this to be a franchise kickstarter with a complete origins setup, but no!
What we actually get is a story that already has Tarzan established and well known in his time, almost a mysterious, saviour or superhero of the jungle.
Throughout the movie you get various flashbacks that show briefly what happened to John Clayton III, Earl of Greystoke, which led to him becoming lord of the jungle.
There is a flashback showing him as a mere baby with his parents after they are shipwrecked somewhere on the continent of Africa in the book its the Atlantic coast of Africa.
Later on we also see Clayton as a young boy being raised by the female ape that found him and saved him from being killed by the male apes, or one specific ape that is racist towards human beings it seems.
Pretty standard origins type stuff but luckily in flashback and not taking up half the flick. Yes it is of course completely CGI for the most part, apparently the actors filmed in the UK of all places!
This I do actually find hard to believe because for much of the time it really does look like they are actually in Africa somewhere.
The CGI for the landscapes is gorgeous for the most part and really sets the atmosphere perfectly with lovely moody vistas.
CGI does work best for things like landscapes and pictures like this do show that fact off very well. But its not all CGI, there were some location shots filmed in Gabon especially for the film.
None with any actors, just purely for sweeping landscape purposes, after all you do need some genuine shots of Africa. When it comes down to things like action sequences and animals, the CGI does get a bit dodgy in places it must be said.
For the most part the great apes look superb, especially up close with high levels of detail that will blow you away. When the apes get a bit more animated and start leaping all over the place then things start to look a bit Marvel-esque if you get me, a bit comicbook-esque.
Did Tarzan actually use some martial arts moves against that ape?? Anyway I did say that the landscapes were awesome, and they are, but the backdrops against the actors at times were not quite so good.
By that I mean the dreaded greenscreen effect was very evident and very obvious on numerous occasions. Kinda felt like you were watching a Lucas sci-fi production at times, yeesh!
The sequence where Tarzan, some natives and Samuel L. This was easily one of the worst offenders for bad CGI and obvious greenscreen, it looked fake as fuck.
On the whole though, everything does look really good from start to finish. The historical accuracy seems to be very good throughout, the costumes are especially terrific, weapons, vehicles, buildings, props, the natives etc Gotta admit, I thought it was a bit silly that all the native tribesmen were built like brick shithouses, almost all of them were totally ripped and big.
Sure this is based on a fictional fantasy about a pasty English bloke who basically rules and African jungle, but would the natives all be that ripped?
Come to think of it, would Tarzan even be ripped, would he even have survived in the first place?? So overall, yes the visuals of the African wilderness are majestic, historically it all looks really solid, the animals are generally solid, but things do tend to get a bit fake and daft looking when it involves bounding through the jungle trees, fighting apes and generally doing any Indy type stuff.
On the whole though I would say this is certainly an enjoyable movie with a great moustache twirling villain from Christoph Waltz, easily the standout performance.
Jackson playing Sameul L. Jackson this time trying his best to be an early 19th century set Samuel L. Question though, who gave the Earl of Greystoke the name Tarzan??
He was raised by apes in the jungle, or more specifically a female ape by the name of Kala. Do these apes generally name themselves and other creatures?
Politically corrected and CGI enhanced bigtime this updated retelling has the apeman up against slavers as well as nefarious urbanite types such as the sneering Chris Waltz, all but twirling his moustache.
Best Films of Share this Rating Title: The Legend of Tarzan 6. Use the HTML below. You must be a registered user to use the IMDb rating plugin.
Margot Robbie Through the Years. Learn more More Like This. Legend of the Sword Snow White and the Huntsman Edit Cast Cast overview, first billed only: Young Tarzan 18 Years Christian Stevens Young Tarzan 5 Years Christoph Waltz Leon Rom Samuel L.
George Washington Williams Margot Robbie Jane Clayton Sidney Ralitsoele Major Kerckhover Adam Ganne German Force Publique Aleksandar Mikic Edit Details Official Sites: Official Facebook Official Site.
Heart warming, inspiring, fantastic. Tohubohu7 Jul 26, This review contains spoilers , click expand to view. Favorite movie as a child, still love it now and kerchaks death still makes me cry, will always love this movie … Expand.
Creepers Mar 25, LoletinAlexis Oct 20, The last Disney movie before reaching the Experimental Era. It contains little symbology, but enough to give it enough potential to fully exploit this great animated film.
There are some visual inconsistencies, but nothing important. FranzHcritic Nov 12, Overly melodramatic, and the music makes the splendid film more corny.
But the film has its moments, mostly due to the weird relationship of Tarzan and Jane. Provocatively humorous, and a friendly, childlike version to the gritty books of nineteenth century.